<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><title>sandwich wrote</title><author_name>sandwich (npub1ua…q99rx)</author_name><author_url>https://yabu.me/npub1uac67zc9er54ln0kl6e4qp2y6ta3enfcg7ywnayshvlw9r5w6ehsqq99rx</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://yabu.me</provider_url><html>So many notes about bluesky, and many points missed.&#xA;- topical reasons: 99% of notes are about nostr or bitcoin, not only are these uninteresting to Normies many are repulsed by these topics.&#xA;- onboarding: bluesky protocol was designed to accomplish a specific goal, a goal that decentralization takes a back seat to. This means they can more quickly achieve UX that closely aligns with what people EXPECT.&#xA;- philosophy: the majority of people &#34;fleeing&#34; to blueksy are statists. That other 1% of content on nostr is overtly anti-statism. Not only would an influx of statists be catastrophic to our culture, you are batshit crazy if you think you can impose a dumptruck of philosophical pivots on tens of millions of people before they shift the direction of the protocol to one that resembles statism.&#xA;&#xA;nostr&#39;s strength is not building another twitter. nostr&#39;s strength is that it is a protocol that enables possibilities that facilitate the invention of new experiences that nobody has yet conceived, possibilities that none of us EXPECT. These possibilities cannot be atomized and codified into a coherent roadmap created by any central committee. Nostr is a place of possibilities.&#xA;&#xA;Being capable of facilitating what none of us expect is nostr&#39;s strength. It can&#39;t be forced. It can&#39;t rushed. The time will come. excercise patience and embrace the unknown. &#xA;</html></oembed>