<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><title>Clayton wrote</title><author_name>Clayton (npub190…rywk0)</author_name><author_url>https://yabu.me/npub190mn5vx7x779egz55rc4eksqxr7093hcudesjtay5hmcufanqf7s2rywk0</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://yabu.me</provider_url><html>The issue is did the “translate” or did the “interpret.” &#xA;&#xA;A good example for GNT vs ESV is Genesis 6:2 (see screenshot). &#xA;&#xA;Notice how 3 translations say “sons of God” and only GNT says “some of the heavenly beings.” &#xA;&#xA;We don’t KNOW what sons of God means, it is debatable, and there are a couple of options. But GNT takes the liberty to assume it means heavenly beings.&#xA;&#xA;As long as you are aware of that, and read GNT with that in mind, I’m sure it’s ok. But it takes more liberties with interpretation than other classics like ESV or NASB (which are harder to read as a result). </html></oembed>