<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><title>ms_foo wrote</title><author_name>ms_foo (npub1r6…mvxdf)</author_name><author_url>https://yabu.me/npub1r6j2apq944wxh5xuxks2eql9frzg29p98rs7p3226s89hdv69t5q5mvxdf</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://yabu.me</provider_url><html>occasional reminder: the_valley™️ does not litigate. i follow shadow docket cases and occasionally write advise-only opinions. but i do not engage with shadow docket &#34;court&#34;. &#xA;&#xA;and regarding entrapment with &#34;appealing&#34; to your hostage taking abuser who false-reported you as a means to game amusement for the X goons: under no circumstances will i enter into &#34;negotiations&#34; with domestic terrorists. my position is documented, public, and clear. &#xA;&#xA;_latches does not apply in perpetuity to shadow conflict regarding my x accounts because it is an unjust system which is amplified by x cons and mercenary bounty. boxes are always available. if the &#34;accidental&#34; false report was a &#34;mistake&#34; - they would revise their report (salvo). they are not sorry. &#xA;&#xA;📰☕️</html></oembed>