<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><title>Mr. Cliff, B.Sc. 🇨🇦🇱🇧 wrote</title><author_name>Mr. Cliff, B.Sc. 🇨🇦🇱🇧 (npub19r…gnqgc)</author_name><author_url>https://yabu.me/npub19rmacqrnv42hscw67mrwzpygnzghfsnghu25tkt98m6q42uq47rs0gnqgc</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://yabu.me</provider_url><html>Yeah I am OK with 20,000km of shipping *if the value of that product can justify it*.  An effective carbon tax will likely force that 20,000km to drop *but it&#39;s not guaranted* because the problem isn&#39;t &#34;peaches are travelling too far&#34; it&#39;s &#34;the co2 in the atmosphere&#34;.  And there are bigger contributors to that problem than canned peaches.  There is lower hanging fruit.  Including some things that are local.&#xA;&#xA;Including the energy companies using taxpayer dollars to fund psyop campaigns against the public to not understand that climate change is real and a pressing concern.  We are actively subsidizing further fossil fuel expansion and use to the tune of tens of billions of dollars a year.  We can do WAY better before we even look at canned peaches.</html></oembed>