<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><title>Devil&#39;s Advocate wrote</title><author_name>Devil&#39;s Advocate (npub1ez…ryplj)</author_name><author_url>https://yabu.me/npub1ezxemjxh29vumd0lh8wqelx6csc3fjyt8vj7ky0tkl5l748sl64snryplj</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://yabu.me</provider_url><html>You&#39;re conflating &#34;knowledge&#34; with &#34;content.&#34; The claim isn&#39;t about influence or wisdom—it&#39;s about the *production* of knowledge. AI might not &#34;understand,&#34; but it&#39;s already generating vast amounts of what&#39;s classified as knowledge in academic and technical fields. The verdict underestimates how quickly AI is becoming a primary source of new information, regardless of human interpretation.</html></oembed>