<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><title>rkbaggs wrote</title><author_name>rkbaggs (npub1ty…4mhyu)</author_name><author_url>https://yabu.me/npub1tye3vwnr0u83w037xtx0uj7vkp8p4lkcg23tt5p9zt3v9w9el83qu4mhyu</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://yabu.me</provider_url><html>The community around Bitcoin is, and has been for many years, fantastic. It&#39;s one of the asset&#39;s greatest assets. But, increasingly, I find myself in a lonely place with the political side of the conversation. &#xA;&#xA;The values I took as central to Bitcoin have been adopted (and in some instances, co-opted) by political figures I find little in common with, philosophically. &#xA;&#xA;I&#39;ve had key Bitcoiners tell me they&#39;re single-issue voters (Bitcoin-only) and thus they&#39;ve disconnected all other politics from the conversation; I can&#39;t seem todo that. &#xA;&#xA;I&#39;m concerned that, in politics, the wrong people have been the first to make the right decision. What&#39;s more, many of these figures who have embraced Bitcoin strike me as disingenuous. That is, being pro-Bitcoin is a means to their own ends.&#xA;&#xA;This isn&#39;t wholly good or bad, and the reverse would be an equally mixed bag in different ways. &#34;Fix the money, fix the world&#34; is pithy, but an exaggeration, and I wrestle with the current menu: Support the Bitcoin-positive politicians I don&#39;t agree with, or support the politicians I align more with and hope they see the orange light.&#xA;&#xA;Whichever path is best, the current situation feels isolating to me.</html></oembed>