<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><title>toxicbitcoiner wrote</title><author_name>toxicbitcoiner (npub1u8…m93f7)</author_name><author_url>https://yabu.me/npub1u87g378r0puytp7zxdl5awg2gmqvqc3vgtnh6a0vfgm4y8es7c3qam93f7</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://yabu.me</provider_url><html>In hindsight, wasn’t Taproot a hostile fork?&#xA;1. Over 5 years later, hardly anyone uses it, except spammers. No major product market fit yet.&#xA;2. It was a “nice to have”, wasn’t a response to a threat (debatably like segwit was).&#xA;3. It ratcheted up the spam problem, which creates another problem now with another possible fork.&#xA;&#xA;If you supported Taproot, then what did you get wrong, such that you supported a hostile fork? Do you apologize?&#xA;&#xA;Before you get to anything else, it thinks it’s important that you ask yourself those two questions, then reflect on the answers.</html></oembed>