rich1.0npub19pyx46ccpcw4egktx5edch39wk54u9x4hd6l7n8h7vlr8q8zzlzss2xkrzhttps://yabu.me/npub19pyx46ccpcw4egktx5edch39wk54u9x4hd6l7n8h7vlr8q8zzlzss2xkrznjumphttps://yabu.menostr:npub1je4aaqtwj8dvph8a0km0wza6yqzcga28ls7ld8z72jxwz9gu93aqvppqlp I was someone who got COVID-19 post-vaccination so Figure 1's forest plot is of interest. Most of what was looked at was statistically significant in reducing complications, in line to what I believed at the time when it was fresh. The idea is to adapt with a lower viral load, rather than the body overreacting to a novel infection. Granted, this doesn't highlight the difference between mRNA and viral vector, nor does it prove clear distinctions between the vax vs. unvax (it's a cohort study so it's a built-in limitation). It's also a single study and can't be definitive on its own. I'd still like to know about the small number of people where spike proteins were still present in their bodies beyond 30 days. nostr:npub1urme07msssujjclaqx7rfk9865qfq48gxz7w0yrx6vgl2n852lzs9wk5zq nostr:npub1j7hf2zpws3vdtsgwuww252f5wqzvu0tak3wu4kudgcl975z84e6q6nuqgy nostr:npub1ttc8j3sx59d4vs0zt23r6p90fjcd040x3vgu4j68u44ydx8u4rzqkxm0da