<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><title>supermassbtc wrote</title><author_name>supermassbtc (npub105…aaru0)</author_name><author_url>https://yabu.me/npub10585tcghn40hc3cqz6zv05sw3su0sthxlkepq3sfchrpa0uah0yqyaaru0</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://yabu.me</provider_url><html>can definitely agree there, but again you are now assuming that the next shitcoin group won’t pop up and find a new non-standard abuse to exploit.&#xA;&#xA;we should not accommodate these behaviors and introduce an incentive to attack bitcoin to get devs to ack changes that are “technically sound”</html></oembed>