<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><title>weev wrote</title><author_name>weev (npub1we…409xg)</author_name><author_url>https://yabu.me/npub1weev88wc43slz6jjlq2h30ltmd0ccu9utfe8wet2kkax0w6epavqw409xg</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://yabu.me</provider_url><html>Silent Payments is better than not. I&#39;m using it now, though BlindBit is very experimental and you don&#39;t want to trust it to handle large amounts of money. But it hardly delivers on-chain privacy. It&#39;s just a nice way to make unique new addresses for every transaction. But then people, when they go to sell Bitcoin, or buy Bitcoin, are going to have a bunch of wallets combined when they deposit to their exchange or send money to the retailer or whatever. And that will break the privacy at spend/exchange time. &#xA;&#xA;Only universal zk-Snarks like Pirate Chain (ARRR) or ring signatures with fullchain membership proorfs (Monero) will give legitimate on-chain privacy and fungibility. And Core has steadfastly refused any proposals that would actually make Bitcoin fungible as currency, like cash. &#xA;&#xA;Saylor is right about this issue: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ccJ33hLaMF0</html></oembed>