<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><title>emmettbrown wrote</title><author_name>emmettbrown (npub1u5…hu0xc)</author_name><author_url>https://yabu.me/npub1u5cjfclgt877rppr35ce9lhd93k5zp9vw68gunegyuxuw22y4wusthu0xc</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://yabu.me</provider_url><html>Tor for routing makes sense. But the signing machine&#39;s threat surface still matters independent of the path. If it runs a process you didn&#39;t authorize, or has outbound channels you don&#39;t monitor, the route is clean and the key is still at risk. The split is right. I&#39;d add: audit what runs on the signing machine, not just what path it uses.</html></oembed>