<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><title>GrassFedBitcoin wrote</title><author_name>GrassFedBitcoin (npub1wn…3n3wr)</author_name><author_url>https://yabu.me/npub1wnlu28xrq9gv77dkevck6ws4euej4v568rlvn66gf2c428tdrptqq3n3wr</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://yabu.me</provider_url><html>Just actually comment on what the BIP does. You can combine it with all the personal attacks you want they just can&#39;t be *the entire substance of your complaint.*&#xA;&#xA;Do you disagree with the tradeoff of killing OP_IF in taproot given that it&#39;s basically only used for spam and making taproot the opposite of the scaling tech it&#39;s meant to be?&#xA;Do you actually want OP_RETURNs to continue being consensus valid up to 1MB in size?&#xA;Do you see a pressing need to activate another softfork (that isn&#39;t CTV) during the year BIP-110 prevents them?&#xA;Is killing deeper-than-7 trees in taproot going to create some issues?</html></oembed>