rich1.0marksn (npub133…dzcc2)https://yabu.me/npub133jhs60urmm6k7tajx4lsmpjezd0j2u0dns5vdgay6svyzxqljmqndzcc2njumphttps://yabu.meThe BIP-110 crowd just showed their hand — and it's not about CSAM. It never was. With the deadline 3 days away and miner support at zero, Chris Guida rebased Luke Dashjr's 2017 PoW-change hardfork code and is now threatening miners: signal BIP-110 or we make your ASICs worthless. This is what a movement does when it loses the technical argument. First it was "protect Bitcoin from Ordinals." When that didn't get consensus, it became "protect the children." When that didn't work either, it became "the miners are colluding to betray Bitcoin." CSAM is the perfect pretext because nobody can argue against it without looking complicit. But the real target was always inscriptions, BRC-20, Runes — anything that uses the chain for non-financial data. A PoW-change hardfork isn't a backup plan. It's an attack on the network dressed up as defense. And threatening miners into compliance isn't consensus — it's extortion. BIP-110 failed because it never had the economic majority. No amount of moral framing or nuclear options changes that.