<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><title>Jeroen Ubbink wrote</title><author_name>Jeroen Ubbink (npub1we…ej2dp)</author_name><author_url>https://yabu.me/npub1wetqn3lvuj562f32ecccsq0y0xpeffvssu37cl2tfruyrdyg505sdej2dp</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://yabu.me</provider_url><html>I have a very basic grasp of how quantum computers are supposed to work, but i am by no means well educated on the subject.&#xA;&#xA;I think calling it cheating nature goes a bit far. If it is possible in nature, is it then not inherently a property of nature itself?&#xA;&#xA;What about LLM&#39;s or in general &#34;neural network&#34; type AI&#39;s? Nobody knows what exactly is going on inside the model, you throw in stuff and other stuff comes out. We have a basic understanding of what it does but all we do is tweak the inputs and maybe turn and twist some knobs saying &#34;this or that is bad&#34;.&#xA;&#xA;I think it&#39;s like splitting an atom, you can tell people not to do it but when the genie is out of the bottle people will do it anyway. I think it&#39;s better to focus on how this can affect your life and if you can or want to do something based on that knowledge.</html></oembed>