<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><title>weev wrote</title><author_name>weev (npub1we…409xg)</author_name><author_url>https://yabu.me/npub1weev88wc43slz6jjlq2h30ltmd0ccu9utfe8wet2kkax0w6epavqw409xg</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://yabu.me</provider_url><html>&gt; Trailers for sale or rent&#xA;&gt; Rooms to let, fifty cents&#xA;&gt; No phone, no pool, no pets&#xA;&gt; I ain&#39;t got no cigarettes&#xA;&gt; Ah, but two hours of pushing broom&#xA;&gt; Buys a eight by twelve four-bit room&#xA;&#xA;Roger Miller&#39;s classic *King of the Road*, detailing the economic conditions at the time for the itinerant (who, witnessing vagrants at train stations, inspired him to write this song) details how good the boomers had it -- two hours of minimum wage labor could get a room for a night. I did a simple search for rooms in what were described as America&#39;s cheapest capitals. The cheapest actual room I found when I put in &#34;I&#39;m flexible&#34; and willing to not accept any specific date was $60, which is slightly more than one can make on minimum wage in an 8 hour shift. I&#39;m sure there are some roadside motels not indexed on the Internet somewhere, but I&#39;m absolutely sure that none of them are as cheap as $14.50, two hours of the federal minimum wage.&#xA;&#xA;I found hostels in cities with train hubs for roughly $20, so anyone today would have to work an extra hour to not even have a room, just a bed in a room full of other &#34;people&#34; who are statistically certain to eventually steal your possessions over a long enough timeline. 50% increase in cost in labor-hours for something so significantly less that it is a fundamental threat to being able to live a stable life. It is materially impossible to be an itinerant laborer living solely off the virtue of your labor now. </html></oembed>