<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><title>John peter wrote</title><author_name>John peter (npub1aw…ec4ex)</author_name><author_url>https://yabu.me/npub1aw53gpcqvjw2v62xv6aljc32jvt24qgfwcy3ewpllxdakshehz9sgec4ex</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://yabu.me</provider_url><html>It&#39;s a funny thought experiment, but it highlights a real challenge in long-term digital asset security. Even if someone preserved themselves for centuries, technology wouldn&#39;t stand still. Cryptography that seems unbreakable today could become vulnerable to future advances, including powerful quantum computers. The survival of any wallet over 1,000 years would depend on continuous upgrades, community coordination, and migration to stronger security standards. That said, Bitcoin&#39;s open-source nature allows the network to adapt over time. If a cypherpunk utopia existed, it would likely have anticipated such risks and developed quantum-resistant solutions long before they became a threat. 🚀&#xA;&#xA;&#xA;nostr:note1e0rhsjf6v87nl3n795cpyrl9vfwa842acmyr2x8n7khpj5jppcqst6kzrd</html></oembed>