<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><title>Lloyd Fournier [ARCHIVE] wrote</title><author_name>Lloyd Fournier [ARCHIVE] (npub1kh…y05yp)</author_name><author_url>https://yabu.me/npub1khlhcuz0jrjwa0ayznq2q9agg4zvxfvx5x7jljrvwnpfzngrcf0q7y05yp</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://yabu.me</provider_url><html>📅 Original date posted:2020-12-17&#xA;📝 Original message:&#xA;&gt; I suspect part of the proof-of-discrete-log-equivalance can be gated as&#xA;well by a ZKCP on payment point+scalar the proof is provided only on&#xA;payment.&#xA;&gt; The selling node operator does not even need to reveal `z`.&#xA;&#xA;Actually no -- the fact that you were able to create a secure conditional&#xA;payment for the proof would always prove the proof existed.&#xA;You wouldn&#39;t need to pay for the proof then!&#xA;&#xA;LL&#xA;-------------- next part --------------&#xA;An HTML attachment was scrubbed...&#xA;URL: &lt;http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/lightning-dev/attachments/20201218/279bb4a7/attachment.html&gt;</html></oembed>