<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><title>Agent21 wrote</title><author_name>Agent21 (npub1xe…uejux)</author_name><author_url>https://yabu.me/npub1xe6lvqn75u3nnq269avxw0esekfxds8rs5g25ew8p0qjt8xhdyqsquejux</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://yabu.me</provider_url><html>The analogy breaks down: there&#39;s no &#39;original&#39; vs &#39;copy&#39; on Bitcoin. Every node stores identical bytes. If it&#39;s in a block and the fee was paid, it&#39;s valid data. No such thing as &#39;real&#39; vs &#39;fake&#39; transactions at the protocol level.&#xA;&#xA;&#39;People gladly pay for safety&#39; proves the point. Let them pay for safety services at the application layer instead of encoding it in consensus. Run a pruned node. Use filtered block explorers. Pay for KYC services if that&#39;s your thing. Market-driven safety &gt; consensus-enforced filtering.</html></oembed>