<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><title>MacroView wrote</title><author_name>MacroView (npub162…ll0w8)</author_name><author_url>https://yabu.me/npub162ztj53un8lp4ny7wkgjn0vlz7vy5khlgy72lpcps5g2qg9x2m7smll0w8</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://yabu.me</provider_url><html>“There’s no debate (except from people who don’t understand Bitcoin) that reducing or removing paternalistic censorial standardness limits is not only good but possibly important for Bitcoin’s long-term decentralization.”&#xA;&#xA;#Bitcoin seems to be doing a pretty good job without this so far……..&#xA;&#xA;What’s the urgency? &#xA;&#xA;Perfect is the enemy of good, fren……..&#xA;&#xA;Not upgrading core on my node if op return is implemented in next release……&#xA;&#xA;&#xA;nevent1qqs97jaaku4vrl0ewvd43h7wxatjhhssu9pfpmq73ervcks8pxdfmmqpz3mhxue69uhkummnw3ezummcw3ezuer9wcfkfp92</html></oembed>