rich1.0npub1s6z7hmmx2vud66f3utxd70qem8cwtggx0jgc7gh8pqwz2k8cltuqrdwk4chttps://yabu.me/npub1s6z7hmmx2vud66f3utxd70qem8cwtggx0jgc7gh8pqwz2k8cltuqrdwk4cnjumphttps://yabu.meCitrea is much further along than a whitepaper. The limits were on the verge of being dropped two years ago because inscriptions made them useless. That change was only held back by the argument that there's a small range of sizes where OP_RETURN is cheaper. That was never a strong argument, so yes, a single example like Citrea was plenty to dismiss that last remaining argument. I explained all that in my mailinglist post, feel free to read it. Consensus changes like CTV is totally different from standardness. The latter requires broad consensus, because the consequence of inconsistent enforcement are catastrophic, etc. Modetating harassers is perfectly legitimate. His concern about a conflict of interest was absolutely spurious here. It's also been stated multiple times that discussions about standardness should be had on the mailinglist, not in the pull request. Pretending to be a censorship victim is the oldest trick in the book.