<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><title>alberdioni8406 wrote</title><author_name>alberdioni8406 (npub1q7…pfzcf)</author_name><author_url>https://yabu.me/npub1q7etlfzq8e4wyks6jxgx5hgqwcsvhhvm0p5rwvf9z96jne4ms9jq3pfzcf</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://yabu.me</provider_url><html>I think people overestimate the “instant collapse” angle here.&#xA;&#xA;Even Satoshi’s coins moving wouldn’t automatically kill the market — it’s big, but not system-ending by itself. Markets already survive large liquidity shocks all the time.&#xA;&#xA;The more realistic issue is the exposed-key problem. If quantum ever becomes real, it’s not just Satoshi coins — it’s a gradual risk across a big portion of supply. But even then, it’s unlikely to be a clean “dump and die” scenario. It would play out over time, and the market would adjust.&#xA;&#xA;The bigger takeaway for me is not collapse, it’s pressure. It forces the whole space to move faster on upgrades and security models.&#xA;&#xA;And ecosystems like BCH, with more flexible upgrade paths, are better positioned to adapt quickly if that ever becomes real.</html></oembed>