<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><title>Peter D. Gray [ARCHIVE] wrote</title><author_name>Peter D. Gray [ARCHIVE] (npub10v…t058y)</author_name><author_url>https://yabu.me/npub10vqyu8x3f0lfttk98xc28ppuyufaz4df8x4aspa9w9xz5z05snzq7t058y</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://yabu.me</provider_url><html>📅 Original date posted:2018-06-16&#xA;📝 Original message:On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 04:34:40PM -0700, Pieter Wuille wrote:&#xA;...&#xA;&gt; First of all, it&#39;s unclear to me to what extent projects have already&#xA;&gt; worked on implementations, and thus to what extent the specification&#xA;&gt; is still subject to change. A response of &#34;this is way too late&#34; is&#xA;&gt; perfectly fine.&#xA;...&#xA;&#xA;The new Coldcard hardware wallet is based on PSBT (ie. BIP 174 as&#xA;published), and we consider it &#34;PSBT Native&#34;. It can add signatures&#xA;to PSBT files delivered on MicroSD card and/or over USB, and is&#xA;able to finalize PSBT files for lots of simple cases. It already&#xA;works well against the existing BIP174 pull request.&#xA;&#xA;I think the BIP174 spec is reasonable as it is, and should only be&#xA;changed in a forwards-compatible way from this point... but obviously&#xA;I&#39;m biased.&#xA;&#xA;As for your specific comments, I don&#39;t have strong feelings really.&#xA;&#xA;---&#xA;Peter D. Gray  ||  Founder, Coinkite  ||  Twitter: @dochex  ||  GPG: A3A31BAD 5A2A5B10&#xA;&#xA;-------------- next part --------------&#xA;A non-text attachment was scrubbed...&#xA;Name: signature.asc&#xA;Type: application/pgp-signature&#xA;Size: 496 bytes&#xA;Desc: not available&#xA;URL: &lt;http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20180616/7ae9d1a2/attachment.sig&gt;</html></oembed>