<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><title>ben wrote</title><author_name>ben (npub100…w7nql)</author_name><author_url>https://yabu.me/npub10000000thpep7auj058803nqtymqlf3rw87lzhe6mkfeywnpxg5sjw7nql</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://yabu.me</provider_url><html>a huge part of Go’s success imo is a dead simple language with one way to do things. doesn’t matter who wrote the code, it’s gonna look about the same. verbose and explicit- no magic. &#xA;&#xA;generics, iterators, now func receiver generics all work against this. you can now write Go code in ways that looks wildly different.  &#xA;&#xA;they’ve undermined the language. </html></oembed>