rich1.0David A. Harding [ARCHIVE] (npub16d…x4wrd)https://yabu.me/npub16dt55fpq3a8r6zpphd9xngxr46zzqs75gna9cj5vf8pknyv2d7equx4wrdnjumphttps://yabu.me📅 Original date posted:2020-04-04 📝 Original message: On Fri, Apr 03, 2020 at 02:51:15AM +0000, ZmnSCPxj via Lightning-dev wrote: > Ah, right, E knows the revocation for the unilateral close of EE, > because it is a self-channel, sigh. And by this revocation clause it > can claim the money immediately and put it into a channel as well. If it's a self channel, E can also just RBF replace the close transaction with a minimally-sized 1-input, 1-output transaction. In addition, if typical mempools are full and the closing transaction feerate is very low (i.e. because anchor outputs are meant to be used) E may also be able to create a close transaction that will be dropped from typical mempools in the near future and may never confirm, allowing E to continue using the channel in attacks against its other peers. -Dave -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 833 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/lightning-dev/attachments/20200404/9350d3a0/attachment.sig>