<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><title>Peter Todd [ARCHIVE] wrote</title><author_name>Peter Todd [ARCHIVE] (npub1m2…a2np2)</author_name><author_url>https://yabu.me/npub1m230cem2yh3mtdzkg32qhj73uytgkyg5ylxsu083n3tpjnajxx4qqa2np2</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://yabu.me</provider_url><html>📅 Original date posted:2022-07-09&#xA;📝 Original message:On Sat, Jul 09, 2022 at 09:43:49PM +0400, naman naman wrote:&#xA;&gt; Hi,&#xA;&gt; &#xA;&gt; This approach raises the obvious question : If someone hasn&#39;t had access to&#xA;&gt; their coins in a long time (yrs, decades, however you want to define it) -&#xA;&gt; and they wish to access/move them after such a time - isn&#39;t your proposal&#xA;&gt; simply taking away their ability to do so? Some might call it : stealing&#xA;&gt; their coins.&#xA;&gt; &#xA;&gt; How does one conclusively prove that &#34;lost&#34; coins are &#34;lost forever&#34;?&#xA;&#xA;Re-read the article: https://petertodd.org/2022/surprisingly-tail-emission-is-not-inflationary&#xA;&#xA;It has nothing to do with re-assigning ownership of coins.&#xA;&#xA;-- &#xA;https://petertodd.org &#39;peter&#39;[:-1]@petertodd.org&#xA;-------------- next part --------------&#xA;A non-text attachment was scrubbed...&#xA;Name: signature.asc&#xA;Type: application/pgp-signature&#xA;Size: 833 bytes&#xA;Desc: not available&#xA;URL: &lt;http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20220709/5fcea1ad/attachment-0001.sig&gt;</html></oembed>