rich1.0postr (npub18v…d8xj9)https://yabu.me/npub18v9ll5jdu96qmn33tpyqdwnjc0fz4adquevj8cav23vlcc4zfh8qpd8xj9njumphttps://yabu.metrying to understand your bitcoin lens: i think maybe anything (anything?) can be described in terms of physics. but quantum physics can possibly allow a description of _bitcoin_ as quantum computation…in an ideal sense of how things play out/manifest/are realized… if it’s (somewhat) accurate…i’ve been intrigued. also, though, i can think how everything depends on the language one uses to describe something. and so also, there’s the thought that if everything “is physics,” then so is bitcoin. /// then to calle’s quantum slop points… spoke w a physics professor last year who basically said (as said elsewhere too) that quantum computing has a materials problem. it’s an issue w the physical hardware that makes it (currently?) infeasible, like it’s a problem for room temperature superconductivity. #wishiknewmorephysics!