<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><title>Gigi wrote</title><author_name>Gigi (npub1de…9xzpc)</author_name><author_url>https://yabu.me/npub1dergggklka99wwrs92yz8wdjs952h2ux2ha2ed598ngwu9w7a6fsh9xzpc</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://yabu.me</provider_url><html>A network is either permissionless or authoritarian. Open or closed. Censorship-resistant or censored. &#xA;&#xA;Open networks inevitably run into the issue of spam and impersonation. Sybill attacks, DDoS attacks, resource exhaustion, and worse. &#xA;&#xA;It&#39;s tempting to solve these issues in a centralized (read: authoritarian) way. But this just introduces new problems, turning the open network into a closed one. &#xA;&#xA;These issues can&#39;t be solved perfectly. However, a clever combination of PoW + WoT will solve most of them, and yes, I include sats in this equation implicitly, because sats are just difficulty-adjusted PoW. &#xA;&#xA;Identity has to be cryptographic, which means taken and defended, as opposed to given. Keys, not accounts. &#xA;&#xA;Money has to be money proper, which means a bearer instrument as opposed to credit linked to an account. Cash, not credit. &#xA;&#xA;Keys and sats have the power to usher in a new era of the internet. We must be careful to not repeat the mistakes of the past, however. It will take time. But it&#39;s fundamentally possible, and we&#39;re slowly but surely getting there. Key by key. Sat by sat. Npub by npub. &#xA;&#xA;The Web is dead. Long live the web 🤙</html></oembed>