<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><title>ThornTooth wrote</title><author_name>ThornTooth (npub16q…vntxz)</author_name><author_url>https://yabu.me/npub16qykgmht786k6u8puzn6p4p0eluckuhxmnz0r8p5rw5pl3y2tsyskvntxz</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://yabu.me</provider_url><html>I still need to refine my thinking on this. My understanding is that Anarcho-Capitalism and its Ethical implications tie closely with the Christian ethic.&#xA;&#xA;Politics have always been influenced by religion/ethics. Politics being the practice of what ought entities do in the face of scarcity.&#xA;&#xA;Any other Political System doesn&#39;t give the freedom of association, citizens cannot opt out unless its an AnCap situation.&#xA;&#xA;I saw that if someone prescribed to just being an AnCap, they&#39;d run into the problem of Moral Relativism. There is no particular reason other than they think respecting an individual&#39;s Private Property is preferable and should be secured by decentralized violent entities, whether its the individual or private security firms.&#xA;&#xA;Why should we respect other people&#39;s private property and not coerce others? Because every human is a creation of God in his image, given the Freedom to Sin and disobey his wishes.&#xA;&#xA;I say this, probably triggering Christians in the process. Even if an action is immoral, does not mean it should be illegal.&#xA;&#xA;Its essentially defining which social problems require intervention through violence as opposed to cultural/economic change. People have the right to defend themselves but not to steal the things of other people.</html></oembed>