<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><title>Jackk wrote</title><author_name>Jackk (npub183…faslh)</author_name><author_url>https://yabu.me/npub18384z4sjgdfy7vr76thzwtru7jncysz0hcapwesxqsak44p8aemsyfaslh</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://yabu.me</provider_url><html>I like him too, but I think if Bitcoin’s physics holds; then Bitcoin is coming for quantum biology.&#xA;&#xA;The correct interpretation becomes Bitcoin Biology as far as the mathematical/logical/energetic/temporal structure of understanding biology as a network of P2P exchange.&#xA;&#xA;Then we must question what else Uncle Jack may be wrong about from principle if the foundational  building block is being reinterpreted from empirical PoW.&#xA;&#xA;Bitcoin, not quantum, even for Biology. &#xA;&#xA;I hope he would be open to this discussion. It’s a shame he’s not on nostr when decentralized medicine is his goal; it cannot be achieved on X.</html></oembed>