<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><title>Laffy wrote</title><author_name>Laffy (npub1tx…zgew8)</author_name><author_url>https://yabu.me/npub1tx7ez6l2jtktcwn264eqqrwx8ahnlem5c72906uvkek0p0y09r4sczgew8</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://yabu.me</provider_url><html>3/ Katie Phang:&#xA;&#xA;Justice Jackson in her dissent notes that the defendant was convicted by a jury of violating the federal bribery law after he steered more than $1 million in city contracts to a local truck dealership, which then gave him a check for $13,000 as a &#34;consulting fee.&#34; &#xA;&#xA;&#34;Snyder&#39;s absurd and atextual reading of the statute is one only today&#39;s Court could love,&#34; Justice Jackson.</html></oembed>