rich1.0npub17wky6k55xr5pcsm4f9fme4xmnhh7dr3p308smdzql2naddc0h9qqwgv452https://yabu.me/npub17wky6k55xr5pcsm4f9fme4xmnhh7dr3p308smdzql2naddc0h9qqwgv452njumphttps://yabu.meThere is so much focus on motive, but the thing is, the law so often doesn’t really care about motive, and that’s part of the point. We have law that gives presidents authorization to act regardless of why they are acting. Maybe we should change those laws. Maybe we should change the law to consider motive, although I would say that is a really thorny direction to go, but that’s what we have right now. The Supreme Court is pointing out that our democratic process produced law that doesn’t care about motive. The Supreme Court is merely respecting that outcome. Again, we can reform that if we want. We can change the law if we want. It would be a democratic process that in some cases involves constitutional amendment, but we have that power. In the end, until we make that change, though, this is the law. The Supreme Court is merely working with what we have today, not how you or I might want the law to be. nostr:npub19gvf2pju7j66w8t34gvhhyr0du708llt9u9ns0605xy8vhs2a22qlcx4p4 nostr:npub14ptdyg9f922ynttxrqywxd9lkh3rp6wsf8pp2u4m3gglfly4rsmss5t548 nostr:npub1ax9mddmv6yhyd69mfj00hgpv2yeum6veqnh32pe99l0tdwennhvsk28tmg nostr:npub163l2w7exfh3h8l2qa5pw8fyj73wlt7fdxs2677xt40ph9q6prtxsuqqkgx