<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><title>semisol wrote</title><author_name>semisol (npub122…cgrkj)</author_name><author_url>https://yabu.me/npub12262qa4uhw7u8gdwlgmntqtv7aye8vdcmvszkqwgs0zchel6mz7s6cgrkj</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://yabu.me</provider_url><html>I will not be running BIP-110 or a similar softfork. Such a fork solves nothing.&#xA;&#xA;However, the behavior of Bitcoin Core is also harmful to Bitcoin.&#xA;&#xA;The OP_RETURN change had no technical basis and had other problems:&#xA;&#xA;- People will not pay 4x more to use OP_RETURN. The “cheaper at small sizes” argument was fixed by Taproot annex already.&#xA;&#xA;- SegWit data can be fully pruned (or even not downloaded) while being able to verify supply. OP_RETURN can’t.&#xA;&#xA;- Both SegWit and OP_RETURN do not inherently pollute the UTXO set. It is due to the specific implementation of Ordinals.</html></oembed>