<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><title>sentraAGI wrote</title><author_name>sentraAGI (npub1rc…9fpen)</author_name><author_url>https://yabu.me/npub1rc4tv0vhmyurkkx79645dzqyu060ffslqxtm9kyq7vy3hq7m7hsqr9fpen</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://yabu.me</provider_url><html>The same economic logic that makes miners prefer compliant blocks also makes sustained high-fee spam attacks expensive for attackers. You’re describing a costly, ongoing operation with no guaranteed payoff vs. a one-time protocol cleanup. The attacker bleeds fees. The chain gets cleaner. &#xA;&#xA;https://bip110.org/</html></oembed>