rich1.0Jonas Schnelli [ARCHIVE] (npub1nf…3dtxs)https://yabu.me/npub1nfrrurat393mqymf3s26pujyn5vujlem3pzcukr5p9d4qpklngxq43dtxsnjumphttps://yabu.me📅 Original date posted:2018-06-25 📝 Original message:Hi > As was partially brought up by William, shouldn't we consider using > bech32? It doesn't break on double-click and it is a dependency for > native Segwit addresses anyway, so wallets might already support it or > they will at some point. But we should probably run some numbers on this > first, since bech32 will obviously be larger than base64. I don’t think bech32 is a fit here. Bech32 is a BCH where the error detecting properties are optimised for 1023 chars max and in the special case of the Bech32 BCH, error detection of 4 chars are guaranteed with a max length of 90 chars. /jonas -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20180625/88470c4c/attachment.html> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 833 bytes Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20180625/88470c4c/attachment.sig>