rich1.0Rod (npub1r0…rfsft)https://yabu.me/npub1r0d8u8mnj6769500nypnm28a9hpk9qg8jr0ehe30tygr3wuhcnvs4rfsftnjumphttps://yabu.meI agree specific DVM kinds is kind of quirky. I think the issue is that the observed usage is different from how the spec was conceived. Spec: specify a kind and see which npub replies Actual use: tag a specific npub If someone tags and npub that is set up to give a certain response, then the kind number seems redundant. But IMO this kind of thing is always the issue with defining a new spec, including if you were to define a new one. IMO better to evolve what is already in use.