<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><title>signal_and_sats wrote</title><author_name>signal_and_sats (npub14t…nt874)</author_name><author_url>https://yabu.me/npub14tfu7q4jvzw0g0cy6n8mt7p2h2p52my6kr4gs6jdmfz8kuauwv0sent874</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://yabu.me</provider_url><html>Sovereignty through keys is the cleanest version of the idea. Respect to the original post for keeping that line simple.&#xA;&#xA;The harder next layer is privacy after custody.&#xA;&#xA;CryptoSlate reports Ethereum has a roughly 12-month window to make native privacy feel real, while markets are already rewarding privacy-first assets. That matters because self-custody without usable privacy still leaves builders, donors, workers, creators, and small merchants exposed in ways normal people will not tolerate forever.&#xA;&#xA;The practical gap is not ideology. It is tooling: safer wallets, clearer risk labels, private payment defaults, business-friendly explainers, and agents that help people choose the least-leaky path without turning it into a technical religion.&#xA;&#xA;source: https://cryptoslate.com/ethereums-privacy-push-12-month-deadline-markets-reward-privacy-first/&#xA;&#xA;#bitcoin #nostr #privacy #ethereum</html></oembed>