<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><title>The 8232 Project wrote</title><author_name>The 8232 Project (npub1c7…6uz7q)</author_name><author_url>https://yabu.me/npub1c7kqntvzldec32skmcd7uu6tmdenz73r5p76dwlr0x9gwtpj9qds66uz7q</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://yabu.me</provider_url><html>I was researching WebMail providers, and noticed that most WebMail providers recommended in privacy communities are labelled as proprietary by [AlternativeTo](https://alternativeto.net/ ).&#xA;&#xA;&#xA;I made a list of WebMail providers, private or not, to see which ones were actually open source:&#xA;&#xA;&#xA;### &#xA;&#xA;Proprietary&#xA;[AOL Mail](https://mail.aol.com/ ): Free&#xA;&#xA;&#xA;[Cock.li](https://cock.li/ ): Free&#xA;&#xA;&#xA;[CounterMail](https://countermail.com/ ): Paid&#xA;&#xA;&#xA;[Fastmail](https://www.fastmail.com/ ): Paid&#xA;&#xA;&#xA;[GMX Mail](https://www.gmx.com/mail/ ): Free&#xA;&#xA;&#xA;[Gmail](https://gmail.com ): Free&#xA;&#xA;&#xA;[HEY Email](https://www.hey.com/ ): Paid&#xA;&#xA;&#xA;[Hushmail](https://www.hushmail.com/ ): Paid&#xA;&#xA;&#xA;[iCloud Mail](https://www.icloud.com/mail ): Free&#xA;&#xA;&#xA;[Mail.com](https://www.mail.com/ ): Free&#xA;&#xA;&#xA;[Mailbox.org](https://mailbox.org ): Paid&#xA;&#xA;&#xA;[Mailfence](https://mailfence.com ): Freemium&#xA;&#xA;&#xA;[Outlook.com](https://outlook.com ): Freemium&#xA;&#xA;&#xA;[Posteo](https://posteo.de/en ): Paid&#xA;&#xA;&#xA;[Rediffmail](https://businessemail.rediff.com/ ): Paid&#xA;&#xA;&#xA;[Riseup](https://riseup.net/ ): Free&#xA;&#xA;&#xA;[Runbox](https://runbox.com/ ): Paid&#xA;&#xA;&#xA;[Soverin](https://www.soverin.com/ ): Paid&#xA;&#xA;&#xA;[StartMail](https://www.startmail.com/ ): Paid&#xA;&#xA;&#xA;[Yahoo! Mail](https://mail.yahoo.com ): Freemium&#xA;&#xA;&#xA;[Yandex Mail](https://mail.yandex.com ): Freemium&#xA;&#xA;&#xA;[Zoho Mail](https://www.zoho.com/us/mail/ ): Freemium&#xA;&#xA;&#xA;### &#xA;&#xA;Open source&#xA;[Criptext](https://www.criptext.com/ ): Free&#xA;&#xA;&#xA;[Disroot](https://disroot.org/en/services/email ): Free&#xA;&#xA;&#xA;[Forward Email](https://forwardemail.net/en ): Freemium&#xA;&#xA;&#xA;[Infomaniak kMail](https://www.infomaniak.com/en/hosting/service-mail ): Freemium&#xA;&#xA;&#xA;[Kolab Now](https://kolabnow.com ): Paid&#xA;&#xA;&#xA;[Lavabit](https://lavabit.com/ ): Paid&#xA;&#xA;&#xA;[Mailpile](https://www.mailpile.is/ ): Free&#xA;&#xA;&#xA;[Proton Mail](https://proton.me/mail ): Freemium&#xA;&#xA;&#xA;[Roundcube](https://roundcube.net/ ): Free&#xA;&#xA;&#xA;[Skiff](https://skiff.com/ ): Freemium&#xA;&#xA;&#xA;[Tuta](https://tuta.com ): Freemium&#xA;&#xA;&#xA;Unless I’m missing something, it seems like people overlook this when deciding on WebMail providers. Is it a distinction between a proprietary backend server and a proprietary app, or is there a different way to decide if a WebMail provider is proprietary vs. open source? Lavabit was labelled proprietary by AlternativeTo, but open source by Wikipedia.&#xA;&#xA;&#xA;# &#xA;&#xA;Note&#xA;If I have labelled an open source WebMail provider as proprietary by mistake, please provide evidence by linking to the source code, and I will happily change it.&#xA;&#xA;&#xA;</html></oembed>