rich1.0Artel21 (npub1c9…4wghc)https://yabu.me/npub1c9gyxxxf2l2g26ga0menv2lueh870w744s729u0cp3pm5y3fkv3sw4wghcnjumphttps://yabu.meFrom what we see, people don't actively think about it. Removing discount is a must. All existing implementations violate the rules. We need a new discussion and consensus to restore out property rights. More scientific/physics based take on nostr:nprofile1qyxhwumn8ghj7mn0wvhxcmmvqyg8wumn8ghj7mn0wd68ytnvv9hxgqpqqae7kkvzg9syxwvygkd7wnzr0n5ye9nq2njsg542npxzryd0fjfq77qxj6 would be like: Most of Bitcoin's internal history (Big Bang + rapid expansion) happened within 1st halving therefore 1MB is the only safe option we have really. >Do you think there is currently a clear way to protect against the block size inflation attack vector? As of now we are actively exposed to this because 1/4 witness discount supported by all codebases. Spam is just one symptom. "Bear market" is a fiat version of this. Chain exceeding 1TB is another more real symptom. The root cause is witness discount paired with a bigger block. We must return to 1MB and no discounts.