<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><title>cameronvaske wrote</title><author_name>cameronvaske (npub1n3…lm3x6)</author_name><author_url>https://yabu.me/npub1n3nx5zyq9xmmz70q2v2kks9h7ukm2vdqw4q4huwvrdv59rlusgqsulm3x6</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://yabu.me</provider_url><html>“We’re not in a world of Kennedys and Eisenhowers at the moment, we’re in a world of presidents that can’t get out a full sentence properly or are just grifting in public, or both.”&#xA;&#xA;More or less, nostr:nprofile1qqsw4v882mfjhq9u63j08kzyhqzqxqc8tgf740p4nxnk9jdv02u37ncpz3mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduq3xamnwvaz7tmjv4kxz7tpvfkx2tn0wfnszdwujn is describing the “revenge of macro” world in this interview episode of “What Bitcoin Did.” Generalists are back—reading across the macro environment is critical to understanding any given issue as sovereigns compete more directly and macro factors shift emphasis towards more direct intervention.&#xA;&#xA;Macroeconomics, domestic politics, geopolitics, global finance, industrial shifts and policy—all of it is significantly less intelligible in the discrete, specialist sense. &#xA;&#xA;An individual policy might make immediate local sense, a trend might be broadly understood, but without cross-domain analytical capability, the whole is beyond.&#xA;&#xA;https://youtu.be/R7xLNkXukb0</html></oembed>