<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><title>ms_foo wrote</title><author_name>ms_foo (npub1r6…mvxdf)</author_name><author_url>https://yabu.me/npub1r6j2apq944wxh5xuxks2eql9frzg29p98rs7p3226s89hdv69t5q5mvxdf</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://yabu.me</provider_url><html>coy, a feminine but also the most masculine patriarchal man in real life, so devoted to the children he raised, ancestry acknowledges sue as his daughter even though she&#39;s adopted and not biological. david, also a feminine, has one biological son with my mother; and regardless of how much my footprint is used by him or what i do to assist his medical crisis - i am not his child. &#xA;&#xA;and my mother, a masculine, dumps in both of their ids. and round and round we go. &#xA;&#xA;digitally, what i find to be most intriguing is that on a genomics tree building website, dna is not supreme. choice is. makes you wonder about eugenics scams and frankie building with grave robbed dna material and mined footprints. as i have said. 📰&#xA;&#xA;🌱</html></oembed>