<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><title>smallworlnd wrote</title><author_name>smallworlnd (npub1tk…pwnl5)</author_name><author_url>https://yabu.me/npub1tkfex6fd5er9h83299pzxcn699lxdrd3ff3859vhqfm9twtz5leqppwnl5</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://yabu.me</provider_url><html>Sigh. Another junk academic article with a sensationalist title but with little substance.&#xA;&#xA;tldr they found a correlation between people who both had some thyroid nodule and also answered their questionnaire on bluetooth usage. That&#39;s right, they asked people about their bluetooth usage and set out to find correlations with medical conditions.&#xA;&#xA;No information on where sub-population sampling was done, age distribution, occupation, diet, exposure to all sorts of other stuff that can lead to the same medical condition, etc., etc. Questionnaires are already a very bad source of information, but it gets worse. They basically don&#39;t have good positive controls and essentially no negative controls. No discussion on how bluetooth frequencies compared to other much more damaging forms of radiation. I could go on. All the hallmarks of just plain bad science.</html></oembed>