<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><title>Séimí Mac Síomón wrote</title><author_name>Séimí Mac Síomón (npub1rj…accc9)</author_name><author_url>https://yabu.me/npub1rjwumr7j6tac08t0qttvc44walt549nc4eyyxjc0phn6yxzj7uzq0accc9</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://yabu.me</provider_url><html>Does anyone have an opinion on Caroll Quigley&#39;s comments on 19th century liberalism? What does he mean here by &#34;society&#34;?&#xA;&#xA;Just as the negative idea of the nature of evil flowed from the belief that human nature  was good, so the idea of liberalism flowed from the belief that society was bad. For, if  society was bad, the state, which was the organized coercive power of society, was  doubly bad, and if man was good, he should be freed, above all, from the coercive power  of the state. Liberalism was the crop which emerged from this soil. In its broadest aspect  liberalism believed that men should be freed from coercive power as completely as  possible. In its narrowest aspect liberalism believed that the economic activities of man  should be freed completely from &#34;state interference.&#34; This latter belief, summed up in the  battle-cry &#34;No government in business,&#34; was commonly called &#34;laissez-faire.&#34;  Liberalism, which included laissez-faire, was a wider term because it would have freed  men from the coercive power of any church, army, or other institution, and would have  left to society little power beyond that required to prevent the strong from physically  oppressing the weak.&#xA;&#xA;#History&#xA;#Liberalism &#xA;#CarollQuigley&#xA;#TragedyAndHope</html></oembed>