<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><title>ftcb21 wrote</title><author_name>ftcb21 (npub1r9…4twmh)</author_name><author_url>https://yabu.me/npub1r9rkzmcv3qqw2lz8u8pkxd5djnvm40khzcehdryu9405spjhe2hs54twmh</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://yabu.me</provider_url><html>Quantum breaking BTC! &#xA;&#xA;No.&#xA;&#xA; It would required 2400 Shor compliant Logical Qubits with error correction of 10^-12, with all qubits working in perfectly symphony with no decoherence. Also each shor logical qubit should use around 8000 physical qubits for a grand total of 18 million physical qubits.&#xA;&#xA; So far we haven&#39;t even created 1 such Shor compliant logical Qubit. &#xA;&#xA;The best we&#39;ve done so far is 2 logical qubits using 50-100 physical qubits with an error correction of only 10^-3.  &#xA;&#xA; Which means we are at least 10 years away from creating a single Shor compliant logical qubit required to break ECDSA. Let alone 2400 working in perfectly symphony.&#xA;&#xA;And even if we do, there are many ways to upgrade to quantum resistant addresses.&#xA;&#xA;#bitcoin #freedom #nostr #hardmoney #asknostr </html></oembed>