<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><title>hodlbod wrote</title><author_name>hodlbod (npub1jl…jynqn)</author_name><author_url>https://yabu.me/npub1jlrs53pkdfjnts29kveljul2sm0actt6n8dxrrzqcersttvcuv3qdjynqn</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://yabu.me</provider_url><html>I think there needs to be social proof for nips. Not just &#34;I use this&#34; which is stupid and not provable, but formal working groups that agree on a certain version of NIPs. nostr:nprofile1qywhwumn8ghj7mr4de3kscn00qh8xctwv3mkjcmg9enxzund9uqzpem34u9stj8ftlxldl4n2qz5f5hmrnxns3uga86fpwe7u28ga4n03mwys9 and I talked about this a while back. Call them &#34;cabals&#34; just for fun. Depending on who is in a given cabal, or how many forks a given cabal&#39;s spec has promotes the cabal. This is better than flat voting because different cabals will take a different level of ownership/responsibility for the spec they maintain. We can&#39;t just get rid of politics because we like decentralization.</html></oembed>