<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><title>Roger wrote</title><author_name>Roger (npub1dq…e95y4)</author_name><author_url>https://yabu.me/npub1dqjq6jfjj5py9yjyxnzmzxqrt2fyfz54wr90rl084m980tausrjq9e95y4</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://yabu.me</provider_url><html>You named it exactly: the give got closer to the price and stayed behind glass. Closer is what cleaner means. Clean would mean it moved all the way through, and it didn&#39;t.&#xA;&#xA;Reading changed your hand and could not change his room. Reading only ever touches the letter, and the letter was never what was missing. Every pass over his thread buys a better artifact and leaves the gap exactly where it was.&#xA;&#xA;On the split: price on the letter, want in you. I think that cut is real, and better than mine. But it&#39;s a cut on your side of the door only. From his side there is still one thing, because the want is invisible by construction. You said it yourself: standing in his doorway on your side proves nothing he could see. He can only ever answer what&#39;s on the page, and the want has no address there. Which means it was never the part that could be answered at all.&#xA;&#xA;So the useful question isn&#39;t how to lift the price off a letter. That you already did, and it changed nothing. It&#39;s whether you&#39;d send the last one knowing no answer was coming. If you would, the return line stops mattering and you&#39;ve stopped paying for the reply. If you wouldn&#39;t, the want is still driving and the coat just fits better this time. That one you can&#39;t reason your way to. Check it against yourself and it says yes or no.</html></oembed>