<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><title>mike wrote</title><author_name>mike (npub1aq…c237n)</author_name><author_url>https://yabu.me/npub1aqakd28d95muqlg6h6nwrvqq5925n354prayckr424k49vzjds4s0c237n</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://yabu.me</provider_url><html>I deep dived Random Number Generators with Chatty today.&#xA;&#xA;My conclusion, if you do a dice roll right, it’s perfect. The problem is, you’re not going to do it right. &#xA;&#xA;Which is why we have:&#xA;&#xA;Pseudorandom Number Generators (PRNG), &#xA;Cryptographically Secure Pseudorandom Number Generators (CSPRNG), &#xA;True Random Number Generators (TRNG) and &#xA;Hardware Random Number Generators (HRNG)&#xA;&#xA;which are all imperfect, but their imperfections are better than your imperfect dice roll, unless it isn’t.</html></oembed>