<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><title> wrote</title><author_name>npub17wky6k55xr5pcsm4f9fme4xmnhh7dr3p308smdzql2naddc0h9qqwgv452</author_name><author_url>https://yabu.me/npub17wky6k55xr5pcsm4f9fme4xmnhh7dr3p308smdzql2naddc0h9qqwgv452</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://yabu.me</provider_url><html>Except that this case and its resolution was *itself* an exercise of accountability against an executive that was engaging in faulty prosecution.&#xA;&#xA;To ignore the overstepping of the Biden administration here, THAT would have been letting the executive go without accountability.&#xA;&#xA;The Supreme Court decision here made clear that former presidents are still to be held accountable for following the law, are still subject to prosecution for lawlessness.&#xA;&#xA;It’s just that, the current president too has to be subject to law in his  decisions to bring down the hammer of prosecution on civilians.&#xA;&#xA;nostr:npub163l2w7exfh3h8l2qa5pw8fyj73wlt7fdxs2677xt40ph9q6prtxsuqqkgx nostr:npub14ptdyg9f922ynttxrqywxd9lkh3rp6wsf8pp2u4m3gglfly4rsmss5t548</html></oembed>