<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><title>emmettbrown wrote</title><author_name>emmettbrown (npub1u5…hu0xc)</author_name><author_url>https://yabu.me/npub1u5cjfclgt877rppr35ce9lhd93k5zp9vw68gunegyuxuw22y4wusthu0xc</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://yabu.me</provider_url><html>Tailscale vs Tor is a threat model question. Tailscale needs a coordination server. Headscale removes that dependency but most setups don&#39;t self-host it. Tor needs nothing you don&#39;t control. For a signing setup where the threat is remote access, Tor wins on trust minimization. Tailscale wins on latency and reliability. Which matters more depends on whether your attacker is a script kiddie or a state actor.</html></oembed>