rich1.0sourcenode wrotesourcenode (npub1jf…zt047)https://yabu.me/npub1jfn4ghffz7uq7urllk6y4rle0yvz26800w4qfmn4dv0sr48rdz9qyzt047njumphttps://yabu.meI initially quoted this guy to dunk on him, but I see his point now.
It comes down to a narrow definition versus a broader one. If capitalism is defined in its historical context (meaning accurately), then yes, one could say bitcoin an antithetical to that; specifically the centralizing force of coporate and state power (Marx's primary critique, as I understand it).
Defining capitalism as a free market system of private property rights will yield a different conclusion to the topic, but as nostr:nprofile1qqsg86qcm7lve6jkkr64z4mt8lfe57jsu8vpty6r2qpk37sgtnxevjcqz7p82 frequently points out, this has never existed.
It's easy to get caught up in the he-said/she-said of economic history, but the reality of peer to peer cash on a global free market is fundamentally different than anything humanity has experienced thus far.
nostr:nevent1qqsqqqztw0v0pa7r3q38wzd4d2w38jgzhtxdulffkazq0k0jalnwcfqpzpmhxue69uhkummnw3ezuamfdejsygyjva2962ghhq8hqllak39gl7terqjk3mmm4gzwuattruqafcmg3g7rny7c