<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><title>fiatjaf wrote</title><author_name>fiatjaf (npub180…jh6w6)</author_name><author_url>https://yabu.me/npub180cvv07tjdrrgpa0j7j7tmnyl2yr6yr7l8j4s3evf6u64th6gkwsyjh6w6</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://yabu.me</provider_url><html>I&#39;m not against the rework in theory, I just thought it looked bad to move things like that, but now I&#39;m thinking it could be good to do it.&#xA;&#xA;But I thought you were a guy who talked only about what exists and not what should exist, given that you should be talking about the fact that kind:1 does have an important place in Nostr.&#xA;&#xA;In my article from before I just acknowledged that and said that instead of trying to fight against it we should embrace it and make kind:1 it the central discovery/public-square/stream of Nostr from where all other use cases can flow and take a life of their own.&#xA;&#xA;So if you&#39;re publishing pictures with Olas, for example, you could publish some just for people who are following you specifically in the photo apps, but sometimes quote some wrapped in a kind:1 so others can know that you also have this alternative photo stream, it&#39;s like when people posted a link on Twitter to their blog post or article written somewhere else or podcast etc.</html></oembed>